<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The blog and the congressman</title>
	<atom:link href="http://mindymcadams.com/tojou/2006/the-blog-and-the-congressman/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://mindymcadams.com/tojou/2006/the-blog-and-the-congressman/</link>
	<description>Notes from the classroom and observations about today's practice of journalism online</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 19 Nov 2008 17:14:13 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Mindy McAdams</title>
		<link>http://mindymcadams.com/tojou/2006/the-blog-and-the-congressman/#comment-325</link>
		<dc:creator>Mindy McAdams</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Oct 2006 13:07:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mindymcadams.com/tojou/2006/the-blog-and-the-congressman/#comment-325</guid>
		<description>That's a good distinction to make, Lex. Deciding not to publish is not the same as "ignoring" the story. I stand corrected. Thanks!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s a good distinction to make, Lex. Deciding not to publish is not the same as &#8220;ignoring&#8221; the story. I stand corrected. Thanks!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lex</title>
		<link>http://mindymcadams.com/tojou/2006/the-blog-and-the-congressman/#comment-324</link>
		<dc:creator>Lex</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Oct 2006 03:16:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mindymcadams.com/tojou/2006/the-blog-and-the-congressman/#comment-324</guid>
		<description>The St. Pete Times editor wrote a column (which was on their Web site and might still be) saying they reported the story pretty intensely last fall but ultimately didn't think they had enough to justify publishing. You can differ with that judgment, but it's hardly "ignoring" the e-mails.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The St. Pete Times editor wrote a column (which was on their Web site and might still be) saying they reported the story pretty intensely last fall but ultimately didn&#8217;t think they had enough to justify publishing. You can differ with that judgment, but it&#8217;s hardly &#8220;ignoring&#8221; the e-mails.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
