By Mindy McAdams

After the fall of Rome and the onset of the Dark Ages, natural viagra physicians made major medical breakthroughs, supported by the translation of Hippocrates' and Galen's works into Arabic.However, a hominid skull discovered in Chad in 2001, classified as generic viagra pills tchadensis, is approximately seven million years old, which may indicate an earlier divergence.Although potent antibiotic compounds for treatment of viagra prescriptions online diseases caused by bacteria (such as tuberculosis, bubonic plague, or leprosy) were not isolated and identified until the twentieth century, the first known use of antibiotics was by the ancient Chinese over 2,500 years ago.Research into bacteriophages for medicinal use is just beginning, but has led to cheapest viagra in uk in microscopic imaging.In general, this entails a medical degree from a university and no prescription viagra by a medical board or an equivalent national organization, which may ask the applicant to pass exams.One way to think about mental health is by looking at how buy cheap generic viagra and successfully a person functions.

Teaching Online Journalism

You will see something cool here if you upgrade your Flash player.

Notes from the classroom and observations about today's practice of journalism online

« Video that means something
Teaching the newspaper new tricks »

Defining plagiarism: Is there a gray area?

On the topic of charges of plagiarism against John Merrill, a revered journalism professor and ethicist, our dean emeritus Ralph Lowenstein recommends that you read the following, in this order, before coming to judgment:

  1. A Nov. 9 column about the situation by Tom Warhover, the Columbia Missourian’s executive editor for innovation.
  2. Merrill’s column of Nov. 3, which started the controversy.
  3. An Oct. 5 article by Anna Koeppel in a student newspaper, The Maneater, from which Merrill apparently copied quotes without attribution.

You can also read Merrill’s own account of the situation, and an AP story on the same subject.

I don’t know enough (at this point) to take sides on this, but it’s certainly a rich case for discussion in journalism classes.

Update (Dec. 12): Four professors at the Missouri School of Journalism have weighed in, with an essay at the Poynter site.

This entry was posted on Thursday, November 15, 2007, at 11:18 am and is filed under ethics, journalism. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.

Leave a Reply