<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:ymaps="http://api.maps.yahoo.com/Maps/V2/AnnotatedMaps.xsd"	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Options for video editing software</title>
	<atom:link href="http://mindymcadams.com/tojou/2007/options-for-video-editing-software/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://mindymcadams.com/tojou/2007/options-for-video-editing-software/</link>
	<description>Notes from the classroom and observations about professional practices for sharing the news on digital platforms.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 27 Jan 2012 00:54:12 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mindy</title>
		<link>http://mindymcadams.com/tojou/2007/options-for-video-editing-software/comment-page-1/#comment-10840</link>
		<dc:creator>Mindy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Jun 2008 18:18:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mindymcadams.com/tojou/2007/options-for-video-editing-software/#comment-10840</guid>
		<description>@George: The programs mentioned in the comments here cover the &quot;cheap&quot; end of the spectrum. As for free, you have Windows Movie Maker or iMovie -- both are easy to use, but not full of features. Either one can be used to cut together a video that looks fine, but the only real bells and whistles you&#039;ll get ar a bunch of cheesy transition effects that you shouldn&#039;t use anyway.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@George: The programs mentioned in the comments here cover the &#8220;cheap&#8221; end of the spectrum. As for free, you have Windows Movie Maker or iMovie &#8212; both are easy to use, but not full of features. Either one can be used to cut together a video that looks fine, but the only real bells and whistles you&#8217;ll get ar a bunch of cheesy transition effects that you shouldn&#8217;t use anyway.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: George Kilner</title>
		<link>http://mindymcadams.com/tojou/2007/options-for-video-editing-software/comment-page-1/#comment-10838</link>
		<dc:creator>George Kilner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Jun 2008 15:13:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mindymcadams.com/tojou/2007/options-for-video-editing-software/#comment-10838</guid>
		<description>Please excuse my ignorance but are there any cheap or even free programs that come close to the usability of some of these expensive programs?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Please excuse my ignorance but are there any cheap or even free programs that come close to the usability of some of these expensive programs?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave</title>
		<link>http://mindymcadams.com/tojou/2007/options-for-video-editing-software/comment-page-1/#comment-10801</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Jun 2008 16:34:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mindymcadams.com/tojou/2007/options-for-video-editing-software/#comment-10801</guid>
		<description>I use Sony Vegas and like it so far. In your comments you said a four hour training session is enough to get someone going in the right direction. My question is where can I get this kind of training? Are you aware of books or websites that have training for Vegas? Have you published any training documentation of your own?
Any ideas would be appreciated.

Dave</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I use Sony Vegas and like it so far. In your comments you said a four hour training session is enough to get someone going in the right direction. My question is where can I get this kind of training? Are you aware of books or websites that have training for Vegas? Have you published any training documentation of your own?<br />
Any ideas would be appreciated.</p>
<p>Dave</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James</title>
		<link>http://mindymcadams.com/tojou/2007/options-for-video-editing-software/comment-page-1/#comment-10677</link>
		<dc:creator>James</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Jun 2008 03:30:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mindymcadams.com/tojou/2007/options-for-video-editing-software/#comment-10677</guid>
		<description>Final Cut Pro now has over 51% of the market, leaving the other 49% remaining to Avid, Adobe, Vegas, and 30 other video editing programs.

Professionals use Final Cut Pro or Avid, and Avid has probably lost over half it&#039;s marketshare to Final Cut Pro in the past 7 years. This year Avid started to post multi-million dollar losses in revenue, if that tells you anything.

Final Cut Pro is priced at $599 for education.

If you going to teach anyone a program for professional use, Final Cut and Avid are your only real choices. They are not that hard to learn. But you can always take the easy route and learn a program that&#039;s not marketable on a resume like Sony Vegas.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Final Cut Pro now has over 51% of the market, leaving the other 49% remaining to Avid, Adobe, Vegas, and 30 other video editing programs.</p>
<p>Professionals use Final Cut Pro or Avid, and Avid has probably lost over half it&#8217;s marketshare to Final Cut Pro in the past 7 years. This year Avid started to post multi-million dollar losses in revenue, if that tells you anything.</p>
<p>Final Cut Pro is priced at $599 for education.</p>
<p>If you going to teach anyone a program for professional use, Final Cut and Avid are your only real choices. They are not that hard to learn. But you can always take the easy route and learn a program that&#8217;s not marketable on a resume like Sony Vegas.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andy</title>
		<link>http://mindymcadams.com/tojou/2007/options-for-video-editing-software/comment-page-1/#comment-2630</link>
		<dc:creator>Andy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Jul 2007 10:29:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mindymcadams.com/tojou/2007/options-for-video-editing-software/#comment-2630</guid>
		<description>Quite a few outfits in the UK are going the Avid Express Pro route. There is a better penetration of PC&#039;s in UK newspapers than there is in the US and other places. Macs tend to stay with the designers.

A number are diving in with vegas - helped I think by the fact that the most common camcorder thats in use is the Sony HDV A1E which has a version of vegas in the box. Liquid is a great package as it packages the whole thing - editing and DVD burning in one easy use interface. 

There is a lot to recommend Avid but having edited more than I would like to remember on both avid and final cut, as well as premiere and others. It would always be a platform thing for me. Go FCP on the mac and go what suits your budget on the PC.  I had a good look around the editing software around in a few posts on my blog  : http://www.andydickinson.net/?p=169</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Quite a few outfits in the UK are going the Avid Express Pro route. There is a better penetration of PC&#8217;s in UK newspapers than there is in the US and other places. Macs tend to stay with the designers.</p>
<p>A number are diving in with vegas &#8211; helped I think by the fact that the most common camcorder thats in use is the Sony HDV A1E which has a version of vegas in the box. Liquid is a great package as it packages the whole thing &#8211; editing and DVD burning in one easy use interface. </p>
<p>There is a lot to recommend Avid but having edited more than I would like to remember on both avid and final cut, as well as premiere and others. It would always be a platform thing for me. Go FCP on the mac and go what suits your budget on the PC.  I had a good look around the editing software around in a few posts on my blog  : <a href="http://www.andydickinson.net/?p=169" rel="nofollow">http://www.andydickinson.net/?p=169</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mindy</title>
		<link>http://mindymcadams.com/tojou/2007/options-for-video-editing-software/comment-page-1/#comment-2590</link>
		<dc:creator>Mindy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Jul 2007 00:14:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mindymcadams.com/tojou/2007/options-for-video-editing-software/#comment-2590</guid>
		<description>David Johnson at Lost Remote &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.lostremote.com/2007/07/27/adobe-premiere-pro-cs3s-intel-only-world/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;says&lt;/a&gt; Premiere Pro CS3 will NOT run on PowerPC (Mac) processors. The new CS3 version works only on Intel-based Macs.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>David Johnson at Lost Remote <a href="http://www.lostremote.com/2007/07/27/adobe-premiere-pro-cs3s-intel-only-world/" rel="nofollow">says</a> Premiere Pro CS3 will NOT run on PowerPC (Mac) processors. The new CS3 version works only on Intel-based Macs.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mindy</title>
		<link>http://mindymcadams.com/tojou/2007/options-for-video-editing-software/comment-page-1/#comment-2579</link>
		<dc:creator>Mindy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Jul 2007 12:48:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mindymcadams.com/tojou/2007/options-for-video-editing-software/#comment-2579</guid>
		<description>There&#039;s Premiere for the Mac? News to me! Thanks, Regina. 

I wonder about Avid Xpress Pro -- is anyone using that? Some people used to talk about Avid Xpress DV, but that has been discontinued, and it appears that Avid Xpress Pro has replaced it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There&#8217;s Premiere for the Mac? News to me! Thanks, Regina. </p>
<p>I wonder about Avid Xpress Pro &#8212; is anyone using that? Some people used to talk about Avid Xpress DV, but that has been discontinued, and it appears that Avid Xpress Pro has replaced it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Regina</title>
		<link>http://mindymcadams.com/tojou/2007/options-for-video-editing-software/comment-page-1/#comment-2565</link>
		<dc:creator>Regina</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Jul 2007 03:35:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mindymcadams.com/tojou/2007/options-for-video-editing-software/#comment-2565</guid>
		<description>p.s. LOVE that the new rss feed shows when there are comments to posts. Fab Feature.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>p.s. LOVE that the new rss feed shows when there are comments to posts. Fab Feature.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Regina</title>
		<link>http://mindymcadams.com/tojou/2007/options-for-video-editing-software/comment-page-1/#comment-2564</link>
		<dc:creator>Regina</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Jul 2007 03:34:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mindymcadams.com/tojou/2007/options-for-video-editing-software/#comment-2564</guid>
		<description>One correction: Adobe Premiere Pro is cross-platform. 

We&#039;re quite fond of Avid Liquid (formerly Pinnacle Liquid) and it&#039;s a relative bargain. Full featured, and $500 if you don&#039;t want the breakout box that allows analog capture. The downside is that it&#039;s not the most intuitive software ever, but it&#039;s fast and renders in the background, great for deadline editing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One correction: Adobe Premiere Pro is cross-platform. </p>
<p>We&#8217;re quite fond of Avid Liquid (formerly Pinnacle Liquid) and it&#8217;s a relative bargain. Full featured, and $500 if you don&#8217;t want the breakout box that allows analog capture. The downside is that it&#8217;s not the most intuitive software ever, but it&#8217;s fast and renders in the background, great for deadline editing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andy Perdue</title>
		<link>http://mindymcadams.com/tojou/2007/options-for-video-editing-software/comment-page-1/#comment-2561</link>
		<dc:creator>Andy Perdue</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Jul 2007 16:49:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mindymcadams.com/tojou/2007/options-for-video-editing-software/#comment-2561</guid>
		<description>The best little piece of software I&#039;ve found in recent years is called VisualHub. I&#039;ve spent way too much money on software that will convert QuickTime to other formats (none of which seems to work especially well). Then I came across VisualHub, which is shareware and will convert to/from QuickTime, WMV, Flash, PSP, etc. It&#039;s a terrific little tool. I use a Mac, so I don&#039;t know if it&#039;s available for other platforms.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The best little piece of software I&#8217;ve found in recent years is called VisualHub. I&#8217;ve spent way too much money on software that will convert QuickTime to other formats (none of which seems to work especially well). Then I came across VisualHub, which is shareware and will convert to/from QuickTime, WMV, Flash, PSP, etc. It&#8217;s a terrific little tool. I use a Mac, so I don&#8217;t know if it&#8217;s available for other platforms.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

