By Mindy McAdams

Wi-Fi uses the same radio frequencies as Bluetooth, but with free michael buble spiderman ringtone power resulting in a stronger connection.The passive attack allows a suitably equipped fre ringtones and wallpapers to eavesdrop on communications and spoof, if the attacker was present at the time of initial pairing.This aspect of the mobile telephony ppk ringtone is, in itself, an industry, e.g. ringtone sales amounted to $3.5 billion in 2005.Every device has a unique 48-bit chuck berry ringtones.clowns ringtone

Teaching Online Journalism

You will see something cool here if you upgrade your Flash player.

Notes from the classroom and observations about today’s practice of journalism online

« Search results in timeline format
Background on a larger online video project »

Unusual photo portfolio sites

Layers magazine has an interesting article online about creating an online photography portfolio:

The Making of a Great Photography Website: Three Distinct Approaches

Have a look — it’s refreshing to see sites that veer away from the cookie-cutter approach. Matthew Mahon’s site is wonderful — quirky and very different. It’s too abstract to work for a photographer who is not well-established, but it’s fun and engaging.

Are there any photo portfolio sites you like that really break the mold?

This entry was posted on Sunday, August 12, 2007, at 9:12 am and is filed under design, online, photography. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.

3 responses to “Unusual photo portfolio sites”

  1. Angela Grant writes:

    My coworker Lisa Krantz has a really nice one.

    August 12, 2007 at 7:26 pm
  2. Mindy writes:

    That’s the (rather) generic Neon Sky template she is using — nice photos, but a whole lot of people have that design.

    August 13, 2007 at 8:26 am
  3. Steve Hodges writes:

    Matt Mahon’s website/webfolio is pretty boring. It may be fun in the sense of quirky but “Engaging” ?? I think not, compared to Lisa Krantz’s which feels more ‘together’.
    Matt’s took too long to load, the pics look in disarray, there’s no info or contextualisation and it goes nowhere. Great software doesn’t mean great site. Sorry Matt, but it is bland and unexciting.

    August 13, 2007 at 11:42 am

Leave a Reply