<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:ymaps="http://api.maps.yahoo.com/Maps/V2/AnnotatedMaps.xsd"	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Magazines: An argument in favor of print</title>
	<atom:link href="http://mindymcadams.com/tojou/2008/magazines-an-argument-in-favor-of-print/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://mindymcadams.com/tojou/2008/magazines-an-argument-in-favor-of-print/</link>
	<description>Notes from the classroom and observations about professional practices for sharing the news on digital platforms.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 24 May 2012 00:37:51 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Hobby</title>
		<link>http://mindymcadams.com/tojou/2008/magazines-an-argument-in-favor-of-print/comment-page-1/#comment-10682</link>
		<dc:creator>David Hobby</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Jun 2008 00:37:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mindymcadams.com/tojou/2008/magazines-an-argument-in-favor-of-print/#comment-10682</guid>
		<description>1. Economist - the whole world in a compact package. Best way to keep up on the road if no &#039;net.

2. Wired - Amazing subject matter, great writing and even better visual treatment.

3. Fast Company - Ditto above, but focuses on The Valley. Should be required reading for every journalist who wants to better understand the world that is leaving us behind.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>1. Economist &#8211; the whole world in a compact package. Best way to keep up on the road if no &#8216;net.</p>
<p>2. Wired &#8211; Amazing subject matter, great writing and even better visual treatment.</p>
<p>3. Fast Company &#8211; Ditto above, but focuses on The Valley. Should be required reading for every journalist who wants to better understand the world that is leaving us behind.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hillary Pesson</title>
		<link>http://mindymcadams.com/tojou/2008/magazines-an-argument-in-favor-of-print/comment-page-1/#comment-9726</link>
		<dc:creator>Hillary Pesson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Apr 2008 20:43:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mindymcadams.com/tojou/2008/magazines-an-argument-in-favor-of-print/#comment-9726</guid>
		<description>1. Velvet Park
2. Communication Arts
3. Juxtapoz</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>1. Velvet Park<br />
2. Communication Arts<br />
3. Juxtapoz</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Carol Holstead</title>
		<link>http://mindymcadams.com/tojou/2008/magazines-an-argument-in-favor-of-print/comment-page-1/#comment-9542</link>
		<dc:creator>Carol Holstead</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Apr 2008 17:24:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mindymcadams.com/tojou/2008/magazines-an-argument-in-favor-of-print/#comment-9542</guid>
		<description>1. GQ 
2. National Geographic
3. Real Simple

These are magazines that are as much about their design as their content, as is Esquire (although I believe GQ, whose creative director is Fred Woodward, is visually stronger right now.) I also prefer magazines that are about the long read, such as The New Yorker, in print. But even though I teach design and love the sensory experience of reading and looking at print magazines, I worry about their environmental impact and their place in a sustainable world.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>1. GQ<br />
2. National Geographic<br />
3. Real Simple</p>
<p>These are magazines that are as much about their design as their content, as is Esquire (although I believe GQ, whose creative director is Fred Woodward, is visually stronger right now.) I also prefer magazines that are about the long read, such as The New Yorker, in print. But even though I teach design and love the sensory experience of reading and looking at print magazines, I worry about their environmental impact and their place in a sustainable world.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nancy Hamilton</title>
		<link>http://mindymcadams.com/tojou/2008/magazines-an-argument-in-favor-of-print/comment-page-1/#comment-9527</link>
		<dc:creator>Nancy Hamilton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Apr 2008 13:49:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mindymcadams.com/tojou/2008/magazines-an-argument-in-favor-of-print/#comment-9527</guid>
		<description>To the list of magazines I read or would read in print, I&#039;d add the readable, issues-oriented publication Mother Jones. I, too, like National Geographic and National Geographic Traveler and Esquire. Architectural Digest and House Beautiful have lost a little appeal over the years, but I still enjoy them from time to time. Sadly, the once-beautiful and very meaty association magazine Audubon has slimmed down and become an imitation of the occasionally controversial, always graphicically appealing magazine of lyric prose that Les Line edited when I was a member of its staff.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To the list of magazines I read or would read in print, I&#8217;d add the readable, issues-oriented publication Mother Jones. I, too, like National Geographic and National Geographic Traveler and Esquire. Architectural Digest and House Beautiful have lost a little appeal over the years, but I still enjoy them from time to time. Sadly, the once-beautiful and very meaty association magazine Audubon has slimmed down and become an imitation of the occasionally controversial, always graphicically appealing magazine of lyric prose that Les Line edited when I was a member of its staff.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Geoffrey Hiller</title>
		<link>http://mindymcadams.com/tojou/2008/magazines-an-argument-in-favor-of-print/comment-page-1/#comment-9512</link>
		<dc:creator>Geoffrey Hiller</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Apr 2008 18:59:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mindymcadams.com/tojou/2008/magazines-an-argument-in-favor-of-print/#comment-9512</guid>
		<description>From a photographers pov of course nothing can replace seeing your work in print.

1- The Atlantic (Besides the excellent writing- some very nice use of photography)
2- Colors published in Italy with photographers included from around the world.
3-The Fader- Huge with younger photographers/ strong design but can&#039;t say I &quot;get&quot; all of the content.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>From a photographers pov of course nothing can replace seeing your work in print.</p>
<p>1- The Atlantic (Besides the excellent writing- some very nice use of photography)<br />
2- Colors published in Italy with photographers included from around the world.<br />
3-The Fader- Huge with younger photographers/ strong design but can&#8217;t say I &#8220;get&#8221; all of the content.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve Hill</title>
		<link>http://mindymcadams.com/tojou/2008/magazines-an-argument-in-favor-of-print/comment-page-1/#comment-9508</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve Hill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Apr 2008 15:26:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mindymcadams.com/tojou/2008/magazines-an-argument-in-favor-of-print/#comment-9508</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the link (and the traffic!)Mindy...

It&#039;s interesting to hear about Esquire - the UK version is struggling at 60,000 a month.

Here are a few UK ones... 
1) Private Eye (media goss) 
2) New Statesman (love/hate in equal amounts) 
3).Net (geeky!)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the link (and the traffic!)Mindy&#8230;</p>
<p>It&#8217;s interesting to hear about Esquire &#8211; the UK version is struggling at 60,000 a month.</p>
<p>Here are a few UK ones&#8230;<br />
1) Private Eye (media goss)<br />
2) New Statesman (love/hate in equal amounts)<br />
3).Net (geeky!)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom Altman</title>
		<link>http://mindymcadams.com/tojou/2008/magazines-an-argument-in-favor-of-print/comment-page-1/#comment-9506</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom Altman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Apr 2008 14:44:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mindymcadams.com/tojou/2008/magazines-an-argument-in-favor-of-print/#comment-9506</guid>
		<description>I think people like magazines for the experience - but the trend is fast, fast, faster.  I just don;t see that in the magazine business.

It&#039;s almost comical when you subscribe to a magazine and get the Christmas issue in September/October - because they have to print it so early.  I mean that is crazy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think people like magazines for the experience &#8211; but the trend is fast, fast, faster.  I just don;t see that in the magazine business.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s almost comical when you subscribe to a magazine and get the Christmas issue in September/October &#8211; because they have to print it so early.  I mean that is crazy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gordon Brander</title>
		<link>http://mindymcadams.com/tojou/2008/magazines-an-argument-in-favor-of-print/comment-page-1/#comment-9480</link>
		<dc:creator>Gordon Brander</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Apr 2008 15:27:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mindymcadams.com/tojou/2008/magazines-an-argument-in-favor-of-print/#comment-9480</guid>
		<description>
The Economist I love the writing, and it&#039;s an enjoyable way to get a grand view of what&#039;s happening around the world (at a cafe on the weekend, perhaps)
National Geographic
Outside
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Economist I love the writing, and it&#8217;s an enjoyable way to get a grand view of what&#8217;s happening around the world (at a cafe on the weekend, perhaps)<br />
National Geographic<br />
Outside</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave Stanton</title>
		<link>http://mindymcadams.com/tojou/2008/magazines-an-argument-in-favor-of-print/comment-page-1/#comment-9461</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave Stanton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Apr 2008 13:47:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mindymcadams.com/tojou/2008/magazines-an-argument-in-favor-of-print/#comment-9461</guid>
		<description>1. The Atlantic
2. Scientific American
3. Sports Illustrated</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>1. The Atlantic<br />
2. Scientific American<br />
3. Sports Illustrated</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

