<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:ymaps="http://api.maps.yahoo.com/Maps/V2/AnnotatedMaps.xsd"	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Numbers in the newsroom and in the audience</title>
	<atom:link href="http://mindymcadams.com/tojou/2008/numbers-in-the-newsroom-and-in-the-audience/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://mindymcadams.com/tojou/2008/numbers-in-the-newsroom-and-in-the-audience/</link>
	<description>Notes from the classroom and observations about professional practices for sharing the news on digital platforms.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 27 Jan 2012 00:54:12 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: albert</title>
		<link>http://mindymcadams.com/tojou/2008/numbers-in-the-newsroom-and-in-the-audience/comment-page-1/#comment-10713</link>
		<dc:creator>albert</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Jun 2008 22:16:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mindymcadams.com/tojou/2008/numbers-in-the-newsroom-and-in-the-audience/#comment-10713</guid>
		<description>@Meranda On the other hand, if Mindy were trying to make money off of her blog, those 2000 loyal readers really wouldn&#039;t be generating any direct revenue for her...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Meranda On the other hand, if Mindy were trying to make money off of her blog, those 2000 loyal readers really wouldn&#8217;t be generating any direct revenue for her&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Modern Journalist &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Better Data, Less Information is Key to Young Readers</title>
		<link>http://mindymcadams.com/tojou/2008/numbers-in-the-newsroom-and-in-the-audience/comment-page-1/#comment-10691</link>
		<dc:creator>The Modern Journalist &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Better Data, Less Information is Key to Young Readers</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Jun 2008 14:34:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mindymcadams.com/tojou/2008/numbers-in-the-newsroom-and-in-the-audience/#comment-10691</guid>
		<description>[...] These two thoughts taken together point towards a dangerous future because staff cutbacks due to poor financial performance and a rigid management structure that hinders digital innovation along with a content flow that is geared first towards print and second towards other mediums will frustrate the remaining workers. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] These two thoughts taken together point towards a dangerous future because staff cutbacks due to poor financial performance and a rigid management structure that hinders digital innovation along with a content flow that is geared first towards print and second towards other mediums will frustrate the remaining workers. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Meranda</title>
		<link>http://mindymcadams.com/tojou/2008/numbers-in-the-newsroom-and-in-the-audience/comment-page-1/#comment-10690</link>
		<dc:creator>Meranda</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Jun 2008 12:17:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mindymcadams.com/tojou/2008/numbers-in-the-newsroom-and-in-the-audience/#comment-10690</guid>
		<description>I&#039;d say reaching those 8 million people beyond your print reach is valuable. Beyond drawing national advertisers, you&#039;re building a brand. Those far-flung audience members rely on your publication to be the first, most reliable account of whatever it is they&#039;re seeking. (In this case, I&#039;m guessing it&#039;s the inside the beltway stories being covered by fewer and fewer local and regional papers.)

As for your own blog, Mindy, it&#039;s worthy noting that your most loyal readers may only click once or so a month. They might hang on your every word in Google Reader, but unless they feel compelled to post a comment or to read others&#039; comments, they may never click through to show up in your hit tracker. Judging by your 2,000+ readers in feedburner, I wouldn&#039;t worry about your audience loyalty.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;d say reaching those 8 million people beyond your print reach is valuable. Beyond drawing national advertisers, you&#8217;re building a brand. Those far-flung audience members rely on your publication to be the first, most reliable account of whatever it is they&#8217;re seeking. (In this case, I&#8217;m guessing it&#8217;s the inside the beltway stories being covered by fewer and fewer local and regional papers.)</p>
<p>As for your own blog, Mindy, it&#8217;s worthy noting that your most loyal readers may only click once or so a month. They might hang on your every word in Google Reader, but unless they feel compelled to post a comment or to read others&#8217; comments, they may never click through to show up in your hit tracker. Judging by your 2,000+ readers in feedburner, I wouldn&#8217;t worry about your audience loyalty.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adrian Monck</title>
		<link>http://mindymcadams.com/tojou/2008/numbers-in-the-newsroom-and-in-the-audience/comment-page-1/#comment-10686</link>
		<dc:creator>Adrian Monck</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Jun 2008 16:15:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mindymcadams.com/tojou/2008/numbers-in-the-newsroom-and-in-the-audience/#comment-10686</guid>
		<description>Re: cuts - how much quicker does technology allow journalists to work? Surely much, much quicker.

Re: reach - is an advertising value and all the value in the chain is still with Google which controls the route to the page being viewed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Re: cuts &#8211; how much quicker does technology allow journalists to work? Surely much, much quicker.</p>
<p>Re: reach &#8211; is an advertising value and all the value in the chain is still with Google which controls the route to the page being viewed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

