<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Positive developments in Los Angeles?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://mindymcadams.com/tojou/2008/positive-developments-in-los-angeles/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://mindymcadams.com/tojou/2008/positive-developments-in-los-angeles/</link>
	<description>Notes from the classroom and observations about today's practice of journalism online</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2009 22:18:42 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Pat Thornton</title>
		<link>http://mindymcadams.com/tojou/2008/positive-developments-in-los-angeles/#comment-8153</link>
		<dc:creator>Pat Thornton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Feb 2008 20:24:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mindymcadams.com/tojou/2008/positive-developments-in-los-angeles/#comment-8153</guid>
		<description>It looks like the Times made the right decision to go with Stanton instead of that other, much older guy they were also consider.

A lot of the old timers in the newsroom didn't want to go with Stanton because he hadn't "paid his dues." Whatever that means. A paper like the Times needed a big shakeup. 

It's clear that most newsrooms would strongly benefit from the shake up a hire like Stanton can provide. Can you imagine having an editor in chief who came from the Web side?!?! That's just crazy talk.

I really like how the Times is hiring a full-time instructor. That's a very forward-thinking decision, and it's the kind of decision that could quickly turn the Times around.

I'm trying to get my paper to institute some new blogs, specifically a breaking news blog and a page one blog (a blog to discuss which stories are on the docket for the day).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It looks like the Times made the right decision to go with Stanton instead of that other, much older guy they were also consider.</p>
<p>A lot of the old timers in the newsroom didn&#8217;t want to go with Stanton because he hadn&#8217;t &#8220;paid his dues.&#8221; Whatever that means. A paper like the Times needed a big shakeup. </p>
<p>It&#8217;s clear that most newsrooms would strongly benefit from the shake up a hire like Stanton can provide. Can you imagine having an editor in chief who came from the Web side?!?! That&#8217;s just crazy talk.</p>
<p>I really like how the Times is hiring a full-time instructor. That&#8217;s a very forward-thinking decision, and it&#8217;s the kind of decision that could quickly turn the Times around.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m trying to get my paper to institute some new blogs, specifically a breaking news blog and a page one blog (a blog to discuss which stories are on the docket for the day).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
