<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Two different approaches to video reports</title>
	<atom:link href="http://mindymcadams.com/tojou/2008/two-different-approaches-to-video-reports/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://mindymcadams.com/tojou/2008/two-different-approaches-to-video-reports/</link>
	<description>Notes from the classroom and observations about today's practice of journalism online</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 20 Nov 2008 17:05:07 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Observation to apply to all videos &#124; News Videographer</title>
		<link>http://mindymcadams.com/tojou/2008/two-different-approaches-to-video-reports/#comment-11233</link>
		<dc:creator>Observation to apply to all videos &#124; News Videographer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jul 2008 12:12:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mindymcadams.com/tojou/2008/two-different-approaches-to-video-reports/#comment-11233</guid>
		<description>[...] Mindy McAdams wrote last week about an observation she made from watching three separate reviews about the iPhone. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Mindy McAdams wrote last week about an observation she made from watching three separate reviews about the iPhone. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Zhu</title>
		<link>http://mindymcadams.com/tojou/2008/two-different-approaches-to-video-reports/#comment-11186</link>
		<dc:creator>John Zhu</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Jul 2008 18:55:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mindymcadams.com/tojou/2008/two-different-approaches-to-video-reports/#comment-11186</guid>
		<description>I like the thought about using entertainment to help convey important information, but I think it's something that absolutely needs to be done well -- if the audience can't stomach the entertainment portion of the report (e.g.: if it's too cheesy or just feels forced), then I think there is a much greater chance of them clicking away from the video than if it's just a dry, information-filled report.

Another thought: I watched the two reviews. The Mossberg one is definitely more "boring", but you know what? I didn't really mind. When I look at video reviews of gadgets, what I want is basically information about the gadget, and seeing the gadget in someone's hands (the e-commerce substitute for feeling something in my own hands). While the Pogue report was definitely livelier, I pretty much tuned out all the "comedic" elements and only paid attention when Pogue was giving info about the phone and when they were showing screenshots of the phone. I think you have to take context and subject matter into consideration as well when deciding which approach to take with a report. Being entertaining can help for certain types of reports, but for some others it just doesn't matter.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I like the thought about using entertainment to help convey important information, but I think it&#8217;s something that absolutely needs to be done well &#8212; if the audience can&#8217;t stomach the entertainment portion of the report (e.g.: if it&#8217;s too cheesy or just feels forced), then I think there is a much greater chance of them clicking away from the video than if it&#8217;s just a dry, information-filled report.</p>
<p>Another thought: I watched the two reviews. The Mossberg one is definitely more &#8220;boring&#8221;, but you know what? I didn&#8217;t really mind. When I look at video reviews of gadgets, what I want is basically information about the gadget, and seeing the gadget in someone&#8217;s hands (the e-commerce substitute for feeling something in my own hands). While the Pogue report was definitely livelier, I pretty much tuned out all the &#8220;comedic&#8221; elements and only paid attention when Pogue was giving info about the phone and when they were showing screenshots of the phone. I think you have to take context and subject matter into consideration as well when deciding which approach to take with a report. Being entertaining can help for certain types of reports, but for some others it just doesn&#8217;t matter.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mindy</title>
		<link>http://mindymcadams.com/tojou/2008/two-different-approaches-to-video-reports/#comment-11176</link>
		<dc:creator>Mindy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Jul 2008 12:52:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mindymcadams.com/tojou/2008/two-different-approaches-to-video-reports/#comment-11176</guid>
		<description>Pogue "spent 10 years conducting and arranging Broadway musicals in New York" (&lt;a href="http://www.davidpogue.com/bio_photos/index.html" rel="nofollow"&gt;source&lt;/a&gt;) -- that accounts for his comic timing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Pogue &#8220;spent 10 years conducting and arranging Broadway musicals in New York&#8221; (<a href="http://www.davidpogue.com/bio_photos/index.html" rel="nofollow">source</a>) &#8212; that accounts for his comic timing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave Stanton</title>
		<link>http://mindymcadams.com/tojou/2008/two-different-approaches-to-video-reports/#comment-11175</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave Stanton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Jul 2008 12:43:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mindymcadams.com/tojou/2008/two-different-approaches-to-video-reports/#comment-11175</guid>
		<description>Coincidental post ... I spent a class session this week looking at different styles of video from newspaper and non-newspaper sources. Pogue was a unanimous winner. He does a great job telling you why certain features are important
--&#62; context.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Coincidental post &#8230; I spent a class session this week looking at different styles of video from newspaper and non-newspaper sources. Pogue was a unanimous winner. He does a great job telling you why certain features are important<br />
&#8211;&gt; context.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
