<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: What is your strategy for video?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://mindymcadams.com/tojou/2008/what-is-your-strategy-for-video/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://mindymcadams.com/tojou/2008/what-is-your-strategy-for-video/</link>
	<description>Notes from the classroom and observations about today's practice of journalism online</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 08 Jan 2009 00:45:23 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Ronald Yaros</title>
		<link>http://mindymcadams.com/tojou/2008/what-is-your-strategy-for-video/#comment-12275</link>
		<dc:creator>Ronald Yaros</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Oct 2008 18:18:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mindymcadams.com/tojou/?p=1388#comment-12275</guid>
		<description>Based on my research here at Maryland, it's not only the "quality" of the video but the length and the specific content of the video. It's also important to know whether the audience is expected to watch a traditional, "self-contained" linear package that runs more than 30 seconds whether the audience can select from a collection of shorter "clips" that are also integrated with text and other multimedia. (BTW, the latter appears to be much more effective and interesting.) In other words, quality  of the video appears to be just one of many variables that contribute to one's perceived effectiveness of the video.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Based on my research here at Maryland, it&#8217;s not only the &#8220;quality&#8221; of the video but the length and the specific content of the video. It&#8217;s also important to know whether the audience is expected to watch a traditional, &#8220;self-contained&#8221; linear package that runs more than 30 seconds whether the audience can select from a collection of shorter &#8220;clips&#8221; that are also integrated with text and other multimedia. (BTW, the latter appears to be much more effective and interesting.) In other words, quality  of the video appears to be just one of many variables that contribute to one&#8217;s perceived effectiveness of the video.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Angela Grant</title>
		<link>http://mindymcadams.com/tojou/2008/what-is-your-strategy-for-video/#comment-12257</link>
		<dc:creator>Angela Grant</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Sep 2008 02:17:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mindymcadams.com/tojou/?p=1388#comment-12257</guid>
		<description>I'm experimenting to build an audience for those videos though.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m experimenting to build an audience for those videos though.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Angela Grant</title>
		<link>http://mindymcadams.com/tojou/2008/what-is-your-strategy-for-video/#comment-12256</link>
		<dc:creator>Angela Grant</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Sep 2008 02:16:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mindymcadams.com/tojou/?p=1388#comment-12256</guid>
		<description>If you drop an artistic, smart documentary journalism video on the Internet, and no one clicks to view it, does it still make a sound?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you drop an artistic, smart documentary journalism video on the Internet, and no one clicks to view it, does it still make a sound?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ryan Sholin</title>
		<link>http://mindymcadams.com/tojou/2008/what-is-your-strategy-for-video/#comment-12220</link>
		<dc:creator>Ryan Sholin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Sep 2008 13:35:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mindymcadams.com/tojou/?p=1388#comment-12220</guid>
		<description>&lt;em&gt;"Because 90 percent of journalism is NOT breaking news."&lt;/em&gt;

Hmm, maybe 90% of journalism isn't breaking, but what percentage of breaking news videos drive more traffic than doc-style storytelling pieces?

90?

Probably lower than that, but I usually argue there's more value for Web viewers in short and sweet than there is in stand-alone story forms.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>&#8220;Because 90 percent of journalism is NOT breaking news.&#8221;</em></p>
<p>Hmm, maybe 90% of journalism isn&#8217;t breaking, but what percentage of breaking news videos drive more traffic than doc-style storytelling pieces?</p>
<p>90?</p>
<p>Probably lower than that, but I usually argue there&#8217;s more value for Web viewers in short and sweet than there is in stand-alone story forms.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
