<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:ymaps="http://api.maps.yahoo.com/Maps/V2/AnnotatedMaps.xsd"	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Why NYTimes.com is a pleasure online</title>
	<atom:link href="http://mindymcadams.com/tojou/2008/why-nytimescom-is-a-pleasure-online/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://mindymcadams.com/tojou/2008/why-nytimescom-is-a-pleasure-online/</link>
	<description>Notes from the classroom and observations about today&#039;s practice of journalism online</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 16:58:29 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Charlie</title>
		<link>http://mindymcadams.com/tojou/2008/why-nytimescom-is-a-pleasure-online/comment-page-1/#comment-10014</link>
		<dc:creator>Charlie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Apr 2008 16:56:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mindymcadams.com/tojou/2008/why-nytimescom-is-a-pleasure-online/#comment-10014</guid>
		<description>Good stuff. I like that Vinh doesn&#039;t expect anyone to meet every single category - not looking for an Internet Jesus.

I guess what I don&#039;t get - isn&#039;t the NYT losing money and instituting layoffs? I understand that they&#039;ve had a great deal more innovation than most newspapers, but given they&#039;ve still been slipping, do we really want to take our cues from them? Or do you feel they&#039;re going to turn it around at some point?

I&#039;m not a &#039;train for print, pray for print&#039; dinosaur. I just don&#039;t know if taking cues from businesses still in a slow decline is advisable. I mean, these are the kind of skills you&#039;ve advocated for as long as I&#039;ve read the blog, Mindy - I just don&#039;t see why saying the NYT agrees with you validates your point. Is it to show there are jobs out there for the skills you talk about? I can see that, but given the NYT hasn&#039;t been doing so hot lately (along with everyone else) I don&#039;t know if they&#039;re the best example of a potential job for J-School grads.

In other news, congrats on the Asia trip! Have fun!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good stuff. I like that Vinh doesn&#8217;t expect anyone to meet every single category &#8211; not looking for an Internet Jesus.</p>
<p>I guess what I don&#8217;t get &#8211; isn&#8217;t the NYT losing money and instituting layoffs? I understand that they&#8217;ve had a great deal more innovation than most newspapers, but given they&#8217;ve still been slipping, do we really want to take our cues from them? Or do you feel they&#8217;re going to turn it around at some point?</p>
<p>I&#8217;m not a &#8216;train for print, pray for print&#8217; dinosaur. I just don&#8217;t know if taking cues from businesses still in a slow decline is advisable. I mean, these are the kind of skills you&#8217;ve advocated for as long as I&#8217;ve read the blog, Mindy &#8211; I just don&#8217;t see why saying the NYT agrees with you validates your point. Is it to show there are jobs out there for the skills you talk about? I can see that, but given the NYT hasn&#8217;t been doing so hot lately (along with everyone else) I don&#8217;t know if they&#8217;re the best example of a potential job for J-School grads.</p>
<p>In other news, congrats on the Asia trip! Have fun!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
